• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Confused about rear axle nut torque.

check other post...

As stated in the other post...originally 96lbs and never saw or heard of any failings and almost doubling it seems overkill...BRP tech should explain...:dontknow:
 
Yeah, if you are going to buy a late model and want to remove the rear wheel, make sure you have a 30 foot long breaker bar for the 160ft lbs...:yikes::D

Pete
 
The OP ronpoust stated he had a 2013 RTS, same torque value for the whole RT line in the '13 Owners and Green Manual. Just saying,
 
Last edited:
My service manual says 161 Ft pounds. I went and bought one of those 2 foot long gorilla torque wrenches.
 
The OP ronpoust stated he had a 2013 RTS, same torque value for the whole RT line in the '13 Owners and Green Manual. Just saying,

.....not quite sure what you are saying there, David? Looks like it changed to 160ftlbs in 2014.

Pete
 
123 N•m to 137 N•m (91 lbf•ft to 101 lbf•ft)
There's a conflict between the owner's manual and the service manual. I see the owner's manual has what you show. However, the service manual for both the 2013 and 2014 RT series lists 166 ft-lbs. I'd be inclined to go with the service manual as it probably was edited more carefully than the owner's manual.
 
JET ENGINES

having built a bizillion jet engines, i'm a TORQUE FREAK....
i had my rear tire R&R, and when i got home, i put a torque wrench on my rear axle nut to see what it was torqued at... 31 foot pounds...:yikes: :lecturef_smilie: :pray:
i was furious... :gaah: i called the Service Manager to register my complaint... :banghead: he was EXCELLENT... told me to 'slowly' ride it back (10 miles), and he'd take care of it personally.... a few weeks later, i was back at the dealer for something else, and the mechanic that replaced my tire was no longer employed there... :clap:
i can't tell you people how important it is to RE-CHECK all repairs & replacements as best you can... :cheers:
Dan P
SPYD3R
 
Spyder3R, I hear you, sad thing is if you have to go over everything that you asked to have done, just do it yourself and save your money. I'm lucky I can do that as I was a tech for 28 yrs but a lot of people have to trust their dealer which is generally in my case and opinion from warranty work i've had done not going to work in your favor. A lot of motorcycle techs don't even want to work on a Spyder and for the most part don't have a clue how to repair them, even if they supposedly have been trained by Can Am. I've had to either take my trike back to have repair redone or take back for something they broke while doing the repair. 3 different repairs and 3 times back and not for serious problems. Belt adjustments. Speedo/tach cluster replacement, side trunk inner liner replacement. Plus new scratch's and fingerprints everywhere. Have given up on that dealer. Safe riding!
 
.....not quite sure what you are saying there, David? Looks like it changed to 160ftlbs in 2014.

Pete

Pete, I get that 2014's and later (Let's call them 2nd Gen spyders) use a different Torque, but the Original Poster asking the question, was asking a question about a 2013 (First Gen spyder), and I have the original Paper Owner's Manual that came with my 2013 RTL, I have the digital Owner's manual that Can-Am released for the 2013 models, AND I bought (apparently an earlier now outdated service manual) that all three use the numbers I was giving ronpoust the OP who asked "Confused about rear axle nut torque.


Can anybody tell me what it is for sure for a 2013 rts...." I was just using the printed and digital information that I got from BRP that said for All 2013 RT series, the rear axle torque was the lower range.

IdahoMtnSpyder must have an updated / corrected service manual that I didn't get so I do stand corrected, though all my (OLD) 2013 Manuals say's erroneously different.

While typing this I went and bought the online [email protected] Green Manual Service manual and it does say the higher spec. Going out to recheck my back axle now I gotta go buy a bigger torque wrench too..... arrrrrrggghhhhh

The latest publication rmr2013-032 Drive Belt and Rear Wheel
Subsection Page 5 I just bought does say the 166 ftlbs...

I get it 166 ft lbs, ignore the lower value in the older docs. I too spent 20 years in the USAF and remember many a time when specs were modified long after the item was in use.... Thanks to EVERYONE above who quoted the correct
166 ft lbs even for 2013's.
Heading to my garage now....
:banghead::banghead::banghead:
 

I get it 166 ft lbs, ignore the lower value in the older docs. I too spent 20 years in the USAF and remember many a time when specs were modified long after the item was in use.... Thanks to EVERYONE above who quoted the correct
166 ft lbs even for 2013's.
Heading to my garage now....
:banghead::banghead::banghead:

Ahhhhhhh. Gotcha David......sorry, I'm a bit slow;)

.....better buy a set of dumbbells to go with your breaker bar though. I used a 3/4" torque wrench with a 2' arm and still had trouble getting past 150ftlbs. Luckily, that's enough with the +/- 10%... :thumbup:

Pete
 
The torque wrench from Lowes works well and don't need a giant bar to tighten to the higher value. Maybe a bit more effort :roflblack:
 
166 ft/lbs is insane for this application. I'm sorry, but I have to wonder if they put such a high torque value as to discourage home mechanics rather than a mechanical necessity.
 
OK then,not confused anymore.

I retorqued axle nut from 100 ft/lb to 160 ft/lb. That is scary tight for a hollow axle, I was waiting for the pop but it held. the belt alignment stayed OK. Just ride it now and see what happens. Thank you everybody who took time to help:2thumbs:
 
I retorqued axle nut from 100 ft/lb to 160 ft/lb. That is scary tight for a hollow axle, I was waiting for the pop but it held. the belt alignment stayed OK. Just ride it now and see what happens. Thank you everybody who took time to help:2thumbs:

:hun:
 
Back
Top