• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Here's the results of testing/determining the Power Consumption of my iPhone...

mecsw500

Well-known member
Using the following device I bought off Amazon, I did some experiments with my iPhone to see what voltages and amperage values I get from a USB connection from a 60W charger via USB C to my 2026 Sea to Sky with USB A.

USB C Tester Power Meter, 4-30V 0-12A Type-C PD Tester Digital Multimeter, Voltage and Current Tester Meter Voltmeter, Power Bank Capacity USB Cable Charger Detector (KWS-2303C)​

I was running my iPhone 15 Pro Max 512GB without using Apple CarPlay to see what kind of wattage I could count upon. The phone was at 90% charged status. My iPhone is running iOS 26.6.1 and my Spyder has firmware release V 5.1.0.

I was running Apple Maps and Apple Music, with a combinations of other apps loaded; Weather, Phone, Messages, Chrome, and Safari browsers.

Running from the 60W charger via USB C, the peak current consumption was 1.6A at 5.0V. Mostly the consumption became steady state at about 1.0A to 1.2A.

Running from the Spyder via the USB A port in the glove box, and using a USB "DATA" cable, the maximum current consumption was 1.44A at 4.8V. This time, the steady state was about 1.2A to 1.3A.

From this, it appears the phone was drawing close to the maximum current draw the Spyder would give at 1.44A. I presume the current draw on the phone was higher, as perhaps it was trying to communicate with the Spyder, despite not having CarPlay started as I had no Bluetooth connection to an audio device configured. It's only 100mA more current consumption than via a charger though.

However, this backs up the fact that my iPhone will very slowly charge when driving, when I connect it without CarPlay running, or at least it will not lose charge. Now, I might be able to eek out a little less of a current draw if I were to disable my iPhone constantly searching for a WiFi connection using AT&T, the "xfinity" SSID, when out of range of my home network.

I understand though, that my iPhone 15 Pro Max is a lower power consumption device than many newer or older iPhones, or perhaps even some of the more sophisticated Android devices. My iPhone 15 seems to have a better battery life than my prior iPhones and my wife's new iPhone.

Skip this paragraph if not interested in the technology behind the Spyder display system I was able to uncover:
-----------
Working back from the FCC filings (with the help of Google, a couple of AI services, and Innovation Control's own website) the Spyder's display board is very likely an Enovation Controls (HQ Tulsa, OK) device running a dual core Arm-A15 Cortex processor. For Apple CarPlay, it seemingly uses one of its two SoC embedded USB A ports, not its USB C port. Whether it runs its USB A port as a High Speed (480Mbps) or a Full Speed (12Mbps) device, I don't know. It seems the board runs the QNX operating system, which will account for a potential for even the High Speed interface running Apple's protocol stack to be well below the 480Mbps theoretical bandwidth. Which speed the board provides, High Speed or Full Speed USB A, might be chosen as to how well the interface copes with electrical interference if the High Speed 480Mbps theoretical data rate was selected. This may also be why a USB C interface with a much higher data rate was indeed, not chosen. The board likely uses separate external Bluetooth and WiFi devices, but I suspect the USB ports are those embedded capabilities provided by the SoC Arm device itself for cost reasons. I'm going to have to delve a little deeper here and perhaps get Enovation Controls to answer questions about their specifically chosen SoC chip, which is very likely an automobile specific version of the Arm device and not something of their own fabrication. Of course, getting hold of a circuit board itself might answer some questions, but I doubt that's going to happen, not unless anyone wants to volunteer sending me one? I think the Maverick R X and R X RS use the same device. Who did the BRP Go! integration, I don't know, but I suspect BRP.
------------

Now I have baseline data, I'll try to see what the phone draws if you were to use Apple CarPlay on the road.
 
Well, one thing for sure is that you have done some good research on your Cellphone's battery consumption.

Good luck moving forward with the project. (y)
 
Thank you.

The little device I mention is about $12, it’s trivial to operate with no technical knowledge whatsoever.

For those suffering from the inability to get their phones to charge on the Spyder, it’s perhaps worth buying one and testing the difference between power consumption from a wall charger and on the bike.

You can use it to decide what apps or functions to turn off on your phone to try to get the current draw below the 1.44 A the bike seems to be able to provide.

Of course you need to do this when the phone is less than 100% charged.

If you test whatever device you want to use on the bike that is powered by USB, you can determine whether you need to go to the expense and complication of a USB power outlet driven by the auxiliary accessory power harness or not.

I’ve no idea what the power draw is of Garmin type devices or forward facing cameras, but that would be interesting know, anyone?
 
Having read the documentation for the Enovation OD1025 circuit board, one states that sustained power consumption of 500 mA or 6.5 Watts can cause the board to shut down. Another source also states, in total contradiction, that above a 2 A current draw will initiate a USB or board shutdown. A full power off recycle will be needed to restart after a 30 second or so wait. The idea is to protect the USB devices in case of a short. The fact the OD1025 circuit board seems to current limit to about 1.5 A makes sense.

However, this does mean that current draws from USB devices trying to charge or run pulling greater than say 1.5 A might be why people are experiencing CarPlay interruptions as the USB device shuts down the connection. Additionally it is possible the display as a whole might shutdown due to over temperature detection. As stated elsewhere from a French site, it likely isn't the cable overheating but the USB hardware on the OD1024 board. At some stage the firmware is likely to pull the over current pin on the SoC processor to force USB shutoff.

If your CarPlay drops out, or your display goes blank, I might wonder what device are you connecting to the USB A port on your Spyder at the time of the failure? There is obviously a limit to what current draw the USB A port will support. Pulling higher current through poor cable choice or high current draw devices charging may cause CarPlay drop out, in extreme cases the whole display system to go blank. Protracted current draw at the 1.5 A limit may be enough to cause issues. This may explain a lot for some owners.

Using a USB connector cover such as the following I found on Amazon, may protect your USB connector from corrosion and hence potentially higher current draws, instigated from high humidity environments.

Cozy USB C Cable Dust Caps with Tether, Protection from Oxidation, Portable Travel Adapter Cover, Black, 5-Piece​
Of course, I may be wrong in my investigations, I'm not an electronics engineer. So if anyone has further or better information please provide me with feedback so I can correct my conclusions.
 
Back
Top