• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Looking for Navigation options besides ACP - What do you recommend?

You failed to include all of the other BRP products in your assessment of what BRP GO does.

The 3-wheel product line is fairly minor part of the company, and BRP GO works on all of the BRP product lines.
I understand you point. However the BRP Go use case for road touring with a Spyder is different to the other BRP vehicles and watercraft. Perhaps the core of the system is portable across each of the product range but the capabilities required for a jet ski are rather different than for that of a Spyder. Perhaps the same software that configures its UI depending upon what machine it is installed on would be the way to go. The whole route planning through street address waypoints is a peculiar requirement for road going vehicles I think.

Me, I stick with Apple Maps on my phone. Sometimes I use CarPlay on the 10.25” display, but mostly not. However, even in the US Android phones are popular. In South America, Asia and SE Asia both Android and increasingly Huawei’s own OS, are extremely popular, all markets Can Am is trying to expand into. Users of Chinese vehicles in those markets are used to highly sophisticated display systems with high quality navigation apps on even the most entry level of motorcycles and automobiles. I drove a Chinese rental car in Thailand and was blown away by the technology embedded in it.

My comment about the USB A’s current provision still stands. It should really be USB C at this point in time to handle top end phones both running apps and still charging. Most phone devices are largely USB C by now with higher current draw requirements.

The comments I make here I most surely make known to BRP as feedback. Posting my thoughts about BRP Go here are to get feedback on my opinions, provoke other’s opinions, and so I can gain some kind of more complete nuances to my discussions with BRP. Sometimes I’m off in left field, sometimes I’m not. It’s nice to have the opinions of others and I’m not adverse to people saying I’m wrong or even crazy. I’m often both, and at my age perhaps even a little senile.
 
What seems to be lost in this discussion is that BRP is a recreational machine manufacturer. They aren't application designers.
BRP-GO is still a non-starter for true navigation use.
To the OP, focus on stand-alone GPS units or your phone. Your mental health specialist will thank you.
 
I understand you point. However the BRP Go use case for road touring with a Spyder is different to the other BRP vehicles and watercraft.
And yet BRP GO! is the app for use across all BRP products, regardless of your opinion that it should be more focused on the needs of the on-road vehicles. It works the way it works. 🤷

As an Apple user I'm quite happy with the way Apple CarPlay works on my 2024 Spyder RT.
 
Back
Top