There was a documentary done by CBC TV in Canada on the difference between regular gas(87), and premium(91-93). Oil companies are claiming cleaner burning and of course better fuel economy with higher octane fuels. In independent lab tests the additives in both fuels were the same so a cleaner burning fuel is not possible. There was a possible slight increase in fuel economy however for the additional cost it more than evened out. Bottom line is, use what you feel is right for you and your vehicle.
It is true that the respective oil companies put the same additives in all grades of fuel (which varies by company). You have to watch the wording. They never say they don't put these additives or even the same amount in other grades. Of course the way they present it you will naturally ASSUME you're getting more with their premium fuel.
If you have a vehicle that will run optimally on regular grade you will not see any increase (and even a possible decrease) in mileage by running higher octane. My opinion is that though the GS, RS, RS-S Spyders will run on regular fuel, it is not the optimal fuel. That would explain why I experience improved fuel mileage when I run premium in my 2008 GS.
It has been suggested that premium fuels may have less Ethanol in them. I don't think so but if it is true, then so be it. Even more reason to run premium fuel in the Spyder.
We use 87 octane fuel and look for ethanol blends where available. Ethanol is a very clean burning and renewable fuel as well as helps to disperse moisture in the fuel system. IMO, I hope we, meaning our governments, lean toward more ethanol in gasoline simply for the fact that it is renewable and can be made out of the crops grown on our farms.
Ok, the speech is over and I am stepping off my soapbox! :thumbup:
This is the reason that propaganda will never go away, it's very effective. When you take a look at the whole picture it is not nearly as rosy as the environmental machine would make it appear.
Did you know...
The E85 (15% Ethanol) fuel that you want everyone to go to will drop your mileage 25-30%? (as compared to gasoline according to 'Green Car Reports')
Polution output from 10% Ethanol fuels are about the same as gasoline. The 'Improvement' comes from factoring in the amount of C02 that the corn plants remove as they grow. But farming equipment used to plant/fertilize/spray/irrigate/harvest & transport the corn and all the energy need to produce and supply these farming products are not factored in.
It takes 3 gallons of water to make 1 gallon of Ethanol
It takes more energy to make a gallon of Ethanol than it does to make a gallon of Gasoline
Corn requires a lot more (Petrolium Based) fertilizer than other crops
More (Petrolium Based) pesticides and other chemicals are used to grow corn that we would otherwise not need
Farmers used to rotate their corn crops because corn depletes the soil. Now that Corn is so profitable, farmers just use more fertilizer
More fuel and other oil products are used in equipment to farm the corn
A 10% ethanol mix will give you at least a 10% reduction in fuel mileage requiring you to burn at least 10% more to go the same distance
Burning food drives up the price of food which drives up the price of nearly every other commodity in the world
Forested areas are being cleared to plant corn
Ethanol attracts moisture causing millions of dollars worth of damage to engines every year
10% Ethanol fuel has a shelf life of 90-100 days
Gasoline has a shelf life of over a year (which can be extended with stabilizers)
No product exists that will prevent water absorption by Ethanol (alcohol)
Those that support Ethanol production cherry pick their facts just as I did here. However, we constantly hear how good Ethanol is, it's much less common to hear 'The Rest of the Story'.
My humble conclusion is that Ethanol blended fuels are a bad deal, that is why governments have to 'Manage the Facts' and force it upon their people.