• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Say Goodbye to the Night Sky?

Albec

Well-known member
https://spaceweather.com/

THIS SOUNDS LIKE A REALLY BAD IDEA: Since SpaceX began launching Starlink satellites in 2019, astronomers have grown increasingly concerned. It's almost impossible now to take a deep-sky image without satellite streaks in the background. The megaconstellation numbers nearly 11,000 functioning satellites, and SpaceX launched another 1,730 during the first half of 2026 alone.

Soon, Starlink may be the least of their worries.

badidea3_strip.jpg

An artist's concept of sunlight beamed down from orbit. Bats, fireflies, and other creatures of the night could find their darkness interrupted by roving spots of artificial sunlight

Last week, the FCC authorized Reflect Orbital Inc. to launch a huge space mirror named “Eärendil-1.” From an orbit about 625 km high, it will cast a moving, 5-km-wide patch of light onto the Earth about as bright as a full Moon. Later, the company could combine beams from multiple satellites to create much brighter spotlights. Reflect Orbital wants to launch 50,000 more by 2035, selling sunlight-on-demand to solar farms, construction sites and search-and-rescue teams.

If Reflect Orbital's plan is realized, it could be calamitous not only for astronomy but also for the natural world as a whole. Nocturnal animals and night-blooming plants, tuned by evolution to the rhythm of day and night, would suddenly find their darkness interrupted by moving pools of redirected sunlight. Small favors? Reflect Orbital says the light will not be bright enough to start fires.

The FCC itself acknowledged some of these concerns, but noted in its order that optical astronomy and the environment lie largely outside its jurisdiction. They can only regulate the project's use of radio signals. For now, no US agency regulates how bright a satellite may shine.

The company's FCC application attracted more than 1,800 public comments, most of them sharply critical. Nevertheless, the launch of Eärendil-1 is now expected before the end of the year.
 
Well, not only will the guys and gals going to space have to be astronauts, but they will have to be race car drivers also to drive around all the junk up there!!
 
https://spaceweather.com/

THIS SOUNDS LIKE A REALLY BAD IDEA: Since SpaceX began launching Starlink satellites in 2019, astronomers have grown increasingly concerned. It's almost impossible now to take a deep-sky image without satellite streaks in the background. The megaconstellation numbers nearly 11,000 functioning satellites, and SpaceX launched another 1,730 during the first half of 2026 alone.

Soon, Starlink may be the least of their worries.

View attachment 255892

An artist's concept of sunlight beamed down from orbit. Bats, fireflies, and other creatures of the night could find their darkness interrupted by roving spots of artificial sunlight

Last week, the FCC authorized Reflect Orbital Inc. to launch a huge space mirror named “Eärendil-1.” From an orbit about 625 km high, it will cast a moving, 5-km-wide patch of light onto the Earth about as bright as a full Moon. Later, the company could combine beams from multiple satellites to create much brighter spotlights. Reflect Orbital wants to launch 50,000 more by 2035, selling sunlight-on-demand to solar farms, construction sites and search-and-rescue teams.

If Reflect Orbital's plan is realized, it could be calamitous not only for astronomy but also for the natural world as a whole. Nocturnal animals and night-blooming plants, tuned by evolution to the rhythm of day and night, would suddenly find their darkness interrupted by moving pools of redirected sunlight. Small favors? Reflect Orbital says the light will not be bright enough to start fires.

The FCC itself acknowledged some of these concerns, but noted in its order that optical astronomy and the environment lie largely outside its jurisdiction. They can only regulate the project's use of radio signals. For now, no US agency regulates how bright a satellite may shine.

The company's FCC application attracted more than 1,800 public comments, most of them sharply critical. Nevertheless, the launch of Eärendil-1 is now expected before the end of the year.
Interesting stuff. There was a published review a while back about the energy storage issues. Sucking up solar energy, then microwaving it to a solar farm required some crazy capacity, don't remember exactly. I'll see if my IEEE login still works, this could possibly be in line with the clean wind power fallacy, but it'll take politicians 40 years to figure it out too.

Here's a fun link for those who've never seen Earth's lower orbit traffic:
 
I remember in the 60's at our family cabin up in the mountains at around 5,000 ft, us kids would go outside at night and lay on our backs in the grass and admire the milky way.
You might get lucky and see (1) satellite, and it was cool to actually see one. Now, meh!
 
Eärendil-1:

Forty five years ago I wrote a thesis comprising of a computer model showing "Satellite Orbit Degeneration in Low Density Planetary Atmospheres" mainly to predict SkyLab's fall to earth. It was based upon theoretical work of Desmond George King-Hele, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough, UK (1948-1988). He's still the leading authority of such things.

At 625 km and the size Eärendil-1 is at 300+ sq meters I suspect it will remain orbital for around 5 years tops, though it might have active de-orbiting capability to shorten that time upon demand. I'll have to dig out the model to check it more accurately.

Anyway, I'll just go out in the desert and shoot at it. (I wonder what caliber is best?) Out here in the west we shoot at anything and everything as far as I can see. That will sort it out.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top