I saw this on Adventure Rider:
https://www.advrider.com/harley-davidson-hit-with-287m-damages-award-in-trike-crash/
Sarah
https://www.advrider.com/harley-davidson-hit-with-287m-damages-award-in-trike-crash/
Sarah
But a conventional trike has always had a serious design flaw when considering momentum and the forces involved in turning the vehicle.
Geesh. That's a sad story. The $ will change things eventually, but they still won't return life.
On a lighter note... $~37K back then... Spyders didn't cross $30K until after the S2S appeared.
As I read the description of both crashes it seems as if the traction control/ABS system malfunctioned causing one wheel to brake and swerve the trike to the one side. This is not a function of one wheel forward trikes, and our Spyders or your family car will do the same thing under the same circumstances. Yes, conventional trikes are hard on front tires, but Spyders are hard on rear tires. Stronger, beefier tires are available for trikes just as better rear tires are available for Spyders. I rode a conventional trike for 4 years and 45,000 miles, pushing it hard in the corners. It was more work than my Spyder is, but it was always stable, no tippy feeling, or pulling to one side, but then I didn't have ABS brakes/Traction Control either, or a rake kit.
Yes, conventional trikes are hard on front tires, but Spyders are hard on rear tires.
And you are right of course. My only point was that both situations can be remedied with a change in tires.My comment was an observation of the tyre wear caused by the front wheel steering dynamics of a 1+2 trike. Spyders are only hard on rear OEM Kenda tyres because they are a poor tyre... not due to any suspension dynamics.