• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Traded my 2019 Ryker Rally for a New Canyon Standard - First Impressions

Tslepebull

Active member
I traded my 2019 Ryker Rally on a Canyon std model yesterday. My selection of the std model over the XT or RR is due to my needs. I never ride with a passenger, and can add heated driver grips, back-up camera, and luggage and still come out about $1500 below the XT or $6,000 below the RR. I can buy a lot of fuel and tires for that. I ordered the Std model last month (three days before the end of the extra year of BEST warranty promotion) when my dealer got an RR on the floor and I had the opportunity to sit on it and evaluate the riding position. It reminded me of my old BMW R 1200 GS which was the most comfortable long distance vehicle of any kind I have ever owned. The RR is still on the floor and my Std was the first Canyon (of any trim) sold by my dealer.

So far I have 150 miles on the Canyon and here is my first impression compared to the Ryker Rally.

1. Height: it is like climbing out of a Miata into a Jeep CJ. I have a much better view of traffic and can look SUV drivers directly in the eye. The feeling is "commanding". The extra several inches of ground clearance make it less likely I will scoop up a dead possum on the road. There is more arc side to side in turns due to the higher radius, but nothing concerning. As so, there is a bit more forward pitch during braking or chopping the throttle compared to the Ryker, but again, not concerning.
2. Ride quality: the extra suspension travel really calms the shock from our (less than smooth; much less than smooth) rural East Texas roads. I specifically selected some of the most awful roads I could find today, and the bump steer and shock up my spine were non-existent. If the shocks ever hit the bump stops at the end of their travel I could not perceive it; this was not the case with the Ryker.
3. Riding position: the upright (feet under me) position felt natural and comfortable. I really like to be able to stand on the pegs when the going is rough or when I need to see over a blind hill. The Ryker's feet forward position put pressure directly on my tail bone and caused a weird flex of my spine, making rear tire bumps really harsh and somewhat painful.
4. Fuel mileage: surprisingly, considering the larger engine and greater vehicle weight, was about 10% better than my Rally and will likely improve as the engine breaks in. It is nice to be able to run 75 at 3900 rpm vs 6300 rpm with the Ryker. Much more relaxed.
5. Shifting: I have never ridden a Spyder, so this is my first experience with paddle shifters. I am still trying to lose old habits of chopping the throttle to shift and have only honked the horn once while trying to upshift. Otherwise, it's very smooth and my left hand once again has the pride of doing something besides just hanging on. I missed shifting with the CVT on the Ryker.
6. Wind control: wind noise and buffeting with the stock windscreen are minimal. I look over the windscreen throughout the full range of travel. I played a bit with the adjustment knob and really did not see much difference between low to high in how much wind I got. Rain coverage is yet to be seen.
7. Mounting the trike: on the Ryker, I just stepped over the seat and squatted. On the Canyon, I step up on the pegs and swing a leg over the seat. Once again very familiar.

I'm not bashing the Ryker; mine served me well over the past 6 years, and if the Canyon had not been released I would still be on the Ryker. However, (for me) the Canyon is an improvement and (for me) was worth the difference in price. Yes, it has only been 24 hours and the Canyon and I are still in our honeymoon phase. Will I regret not getting the RR? I don't know, we will see how I feel after the first 500 mile day in the rain.
 
Last edited:
Excellent initial impression, very informative and really liked your impression of the uprite seating position. The GS series of the BMW's provide my favorite seating on a motorcycle.
 
Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts with us, Tslepebull. I’m looking forward to hearing more. 😊

Sarah
 
Great review, especially the contrast between Ryker and Canyon. I hope you enjoy many miles.

Ryker to Canyon might be a logical step for some. However, I do not see RT or F3 riders doing that. As I and Lamonster have stated, don't go very far off road on one.
 
Thanks for the write-up. I'm thinking of getting the base version as well here in the UK. The extra for the XT is thousands more than the extras I would want to add.

One thing I have noticed from studying videos is that the bag mounting looks to be standard SHAD layout, with nothing specific to the Canyon on the bags. As the bags are SHAD Terra this does suggest you could just buy the SHAD version rather than the Can-Am branded bags.

Here in the UK they are both half the price (a considerable saving) and there is a larger 47L side case and 55L Top case that should fit. My one criticism of the bags on the Canyon is that they chose smaller versions to fit which I don't understand. The 47L are only 60mm wider and will still easily fit within the spread of the front wheels.

Anyway, just an untested observation of mine if you do come to get some bags, maybe try some standard SHAD bags if you can find a dealer with in hand stock. They are identical apart from the Can-Am logo.
 
Very nice write up. I got a chance to sit on a Redrock last Tuesday while having my RTL serviced, and the week before at another dealership. I have a 2021 RTL that I am about to head out on a 7,000-8,000 mile cross country trip on in 3 weeks. I also have a 2016 F3L Special Series. They satisfy 99% of my 3 wheeled needs, as I do no real off road and very little dirt road riding. I have come across 1 situation where I really wish I had a Canyon or a Ryker. With people stepping up to the Canyon, I might pick up a nice used Ryker for that 1% of the time that I would like one. Maybe if I have one, it will increase to 5%. Lol!
 
Thanks for the write-up. I'm thinking of getting the base version as well here in the UK. The extra for the XT is thousands more than the extras I would want to add.

One thing I have noticed from studying videos is that the bag mounting looks to be standard SHAD layout, with nothing specific to the Canyon on the bags. As the bags are SHAD Terra this does suggest you could just buy the SHAD version rather than the Can-Am branded bags.

Here in the UK they are both half the price (a considerable saving) and there is a larger 47L side case and 55L Top case that should fit. My one criticism of the bags on the Canyon is that they chose smaller versions to fit which I don't understand. The 47L are only 60mm wider and will still easily fit within the spread of the front wheels.

Anyway, just an untested observation of mine if you do come to get some bags, maybe try some standard SHAD bags if you can find a dealer with in hand stock. They are identical apart from the Can-Am logo.
That is a very interesting proposition. If it can be verified that the Shad Terra bags would fit I would like to give that a try. I have already purchased the BRP Linq Adapter plate (PN:860202208) for their SeaDoo SkiDoo line and bolted it to the trunk from my old BMW GS. It fits perfectly on the Linq fastners on the rear cargo plate. It would be nice to add the Shad side bags.

trunk 2.jpg
 
You'll have a nice set up Tslepebull, thanks for sharing with us. In the meantime, how about some more pictures of your stock bike, if it's not too much trouble. Thanks again!

Sarah
 
Thank you. Haven't seen a Canyon in person yet, but it looks like the ticket if I were to move from my Ryker. I have a long history on dual sports, 1150GS, F650GS, DR650 and so on. The Canyon gets a big thumbs up from me.

Sarah
 
Thanks for the write-up. I'm thinking of getting the base version as well here in the UK. The extra for the XT is thousands more than the extras I would want to add.

One thing I have noticed from studying videos is that the bag mounting looks to be standard SHAD layout, with nothing specific to the Canyon on the bags. As the bags are SHAD Terra this does suggest you could just buy the SHAD version rather than the Can-Am branded bags.

Here in the UK they are both half the price (a considerable saving) and there is a larger 47L side case and 55L Top case that should fit. My one criticism of the bags on the Canyon is that they chose smaller versions to fit which I don't understand. The 47L are only 60mm wider and will still easily fit within the spread of the front wheels.

Anyway, just an untested observation of mine if you do come to get some bags, maybe try some standard SHAD bags if you can find a dealer with in hand stock. They are identical apart from the Can-Am logo.
I have also ordered the base model Canyon and my UK dealer has it. I also did order several of the Can-Am accessories, saving against the XT and the Redrock, as I am a solo rider; but I don’t think the accessories are in yet.
I will probably get it next week, even if none of the accessories are in, as it will still be OK to ride.

Ref the Shad Panniers and Top Case, the fittings used by the Canyon are different to the fittings on the normal Shad Terra units, so I don’t think they will fit unless you modify them to fit the pannier rails and the Top Case uses the BRP LinQ system, as you don’t need a Shad base plate for that.
You can purchase the Shad inner bags as they are the same as the Can- Am gear, but they will have the SHAD logo on them and are cheaper.

Join the Can-Am Canyon Lovers Facebook group as there is a lot of useful information on there.
 
Thanks for the write-up. I'm thinking of getting the base version as well here in the UK. The extra for the XT is thousands more than the extras I would want to add.

One thing I have noticed from studying videos is that the bag mounting looks to be standard SHAD layout, with nothing specific to the Canyon on the bags. As the bags are SHAD Terra this does suggest you could just buy the SHAD version rather than the Can-Am branded bags.

Here in the UK they are both half the price (a considerable saving) and there is a larger 47L side case and 55L Top case that should fit. My one criticism of the bags on the Canyon is that they chose smaller versions to fit which I don't understand. The 47L are only 60mm wider and will still easily fit within the spread of the front wheels.

Anyway, just an untested observation of mine if you do come to get some bags, maybe try some standard SHAD bags if you can find a dealer with in hand stock. They are identical apart from the Can-Am logo.
Well, it seemed like a good idea. I ordered a set of the 47L Shad Terra cases from Amazon. They came in today. However, they will not work with the Canyon. The mounting hook on the generic Shad Terra's is 6" wide. The bar between the upright pieces on the Canyon mount is only 4.75", so the upright pieces prevent the mounting hook from engaging. Apparently, BRP was clever enough to have proprietary mounting hooks made for the Can Am Shad bags that prevent use of the generic Terra bags.

Oh well, on to plan B and the purchase of the Canyon marked bags. BUT, they are out of stock. Now the wait starts. At least I have my DIY tail trunk for grocery runs.
 
Sarah, when you get a chance to sit on one I think you will find the riding position very familiar.
Hi @Tslepebull,

I sat on a Canyon Redock at my dealership today, and I feel the riding position is very familiar to the F3 & RT Spyder models. The seat is not as comfortable when compared to the F3 or the RTS seats (driver). You sit higher and more upright on the Canyon Redock.

Also, the dealership had an accessory pouch fitted below the ignition switch - the accessory pouch was from BRP and it had 2 small compartments in the pouch where you could maybe put a pair of sunglasses, or some other small items like a chap stick, keys, coins, or insurance/registration paperwork. It had a cover with a zipper.

Deanna
 
Back
Top